Judgment

The constitutional principle of fair trial requires the specificity of the grounds of appeal

Our judgment: the constitutional principle of fair trial requires the specificity of the grounds of appeal (Court of Appeal of Naples, Labour Division, judgment no. 3028 of 9 May 2016) A worker appealed before the Court of Appeal on a judgment which rejected the question of the formulated recognition of occupational diseases. In defending the […]

Conditions of validity for non-competition agreements

Our Judgment: Conditions of validity for non-competition agreements (Court of Treviso, Ordinance 11/14 April 2016) It is permissible for a non-competition agreement with an employee (which restricts the latter from carrying out, on behalf of a competitor, “any activities in a broad sense in competition” with the employer) to be integrated, in terms of interpretation, […]

Our Judgment: Project work in call centres

Our Judgment: Project work in call centres In cases contesting the genuine nature of the collaborations, the burden of proof lies on the DTL (Court of Macerata work July 18, 2016) The case stems from an inspection by the Territorial Directorate of Labour of Macerata at a call centre. Following this inspection, DTL issued, in […]

September: the judgment of the month

September: the judgment of the month With the recent ruling no. 17325 dated 25 August 2016, the Supreme Court held that under the “Rite Fornero,” the non-notification of an action in opposition to the law determines the admissibility of that action. The provision in question is Article. 1, paragraph 52 of Law no. 92/2012, according […]

The time-limit of 180 days for filing the appeal runs from the delivery of the letter of termination of employment, as so ruled by Cassino Court by ordinance 23 February 2016. Our Judgment.

The time-limit of 180 days for filing the appeal runs from the delivery of the letter of termination of employment, as so ruled by Cassino Court by ordinance 23 February 2016. Our Judgment. Within the scope of the Fornero law (Law 92/2012), the defense of the Company has objected to the the revocation of the […]